![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Known quality issues with ERA-Interim data |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Known quality issues with ERA-Interim data
Please see our publications and reports for detailed discussion of many aspects of ERA-Interim data quality. Spurious shifts in ERA-Interim time-series related to changes in the observing system include:
ERA-Interim used corrupted sea-ice cover data near Antarctica on 1 August 2005 . ERA-Interim snow analyses from 1 July 2003 to 23 February 2010 are affected by a geo-location error introduced during the processing of NESDIS snow cover data. Data locations were shifted by about 100km toward the South-East, causing incorrect removal of snow in some coastal areas in the Northern Hemisphere during winter. This error has been present in the ECMWF operational forecasting system from 18 March 2004 until 23 February 2010, when it was discovered and corrected (26 May 2010). Data for February 2009 were replaced in the MARS archive on 15 May 2009 1500UTC, and on the Data Server on 18 May 2009 1200UTC (1 July 2009). Prescribed sea-ice fraction and sea-surface temperature data for ERA-Interim are as for ERA-40 prior to January 2002; i.e. based on the NCEP 2DVAR dataset to the end of June 2001 and the NCEP OISST V2 product from July to December 2001. From 1 January 2002 ERA-Interim follows the ECMWF operational forecasting system, using the NCEP RTG product until 31 January 2009 , and the OSTIA product from 1 February 2009. (19 May 2009; updated 3 June 2010). The values of convective available potential energy (CAPE) at step 3 hours are erroneously zero in the CAPE products (13 May 2009). Due to an error in the ECMWF forecast model, incident solar radiation at the top of the atmosphere is approximately 3Wm-2 higher than intended. This has resulted in a slightly warmer (approximately 1K) upper stratosphere for the entire ERA-Interim period (4 May 2009).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||