Home page  
Home   Your Room   Login   Contact   Feedback   Site Map   Search:  
Discover this product  
About Us
Overview
Getting here
Committees
Products
Forecasts
Order Data
Order Software
Services
Computing
Archive
PrepIFS
Research
Modelling
Reanalysis
Seasonal
Publications
Newsletters
Manuals
Library
News&Events
Calendar
Employment
Open Tenders
   
User Guide to ECMWF Forecast Products > Appendix A Some statistical concepts to facilitate the use and interpretation of deterministic medium-range forecasts > Forecast verification > 
Error saturation level Interpretation of verification statistics  
   

Measure of skill - the anomaly correlation coefficient

Browse
Measures of accuracy
The effect of mean, analysis and observation errors on the RMSE
The decomposition of MSE
Forecast error baseline
Error saturation level
Measure of skill - the anomaly correlation coefficient
 
 

Another way to measure the quality of a forecast system is to calculate the correlation between forecasts and observations. However, correlating forecasts directly with observations or analyses may give mislead­ingly high values because of the seasonal variations. It is therefore established practice to subtract the climate average from both the forecast and the verification and to verify the forecast and observed anomalies according to the anomaly correla­tion coefficient (ACC), which in its most simple form can be written:

image085.png

The WMO definition also takes any mean error into account:

image086.png

The ACC can be regarded as a skill score relative to the climate. It is positively orientated, with increasing numerical values indicating increasing “success”. It has been found empirically that ACC=60% corresponds to the range up to which there is synoptic skill for the largest scale weather patterns. ACC=50% corresponds to forecasts for which the error is the same as for a forecast based on a climatological average, i.e. RMSE = Aa. An ACC of about 80% would correspond to a range where there is still some skill in large-scale synoptic patterns.




Top of page 08-02-2012
 
   Compare Pages Page Details         © ECMWF
Error saturation level Interpretation of verification statistics  
shim shim shim