Home page  
Home   Your Room   Login   Contact   Feedback   Site Map   Search:  
Discover this product  
About Us
Overview
Getting here
Committees
Products
Forecasts
Order Data
Order Software
Services
Computing
Archive
PrepIFS
Research
Modelling
Reanalysis
Seasonal
Publications
Newsletters
Manuals
Library
News&Events
Calendar
Employment
Open Tenders
   
User Guide to ECMWF Forecast Products > Appendix A Some statistical concepts to facilitate the use and interpretation of deterministic medium-range forecasts > Forecast verification > 
Forecast error baseline Measure of skill - the anomaly correlation coefficient  
   

Error saturation level

Browse
Measures of accuracy
The effect of mean, analysis and observation errors on the RMSE
The decomposition of MSE
Forecast error baseline
Error saturation level
Measure of skill - the anomaly correlation coefficient
 
 

Forecast errors do not grow indefinitely but asymptotically approach a maximum, the  “Error Saturation Level” (ESL).  

Forecast_Error_Growth.gif

Figure 66 The error growth in a state-of-the-art NWP forecast system will at some stage display larger errors than a climatological average used as forecast and will, as do the errors of persistence forecasts and guesses, asymptotically approach an error level 41% above that of a forecast based on a climatological average

For extended forecast ranges, with decreasing correspondence between forecast and observed anomalies, the covariance term approaches zero. For Af=Aa  this yields an ESL at

RMSE = Esaturation= Aa image083.png

which is 41% larger than Eclimate, the error when a climatological average is used as a forecast (see Figure 66). The value Aa image084.png  is also the ESL for persistence fore­casts or guesses based on climatological distributions.




Top of page 08-02-2012
 
   Compare Pages Page Details         © ECMWF
Forecast error baseline Measure of skill - the anomaly correlation coefficient  
shim shim shim