Home page  
Home   Your Room   Login   Contact   Feedback   Site Map   Search:  
Discover this product  
About Us
Overview
Getting here
Committees
Products
Forecasts
Order Data
Order Software
Services
Computing
Archive
PrepIFS
Research
Modelling
Reanalysis
Seasonal
Publications
Newsletters
Manuals
Library
News&Events
Calendar
Employment
Open Tenders
   
User Guide to ECMWF Forecast Products > The use of the Ensemble Prediction forecasts > Variance measures > 
 Conflicting spread indications  Spaghetti diagrams  
   

Epsgrams

Browse
The ensemble spread
Standard deviation fields
Conflicting spread indications
Epsgrams
Spaghetti diagrams
Positions of surface lows
Clusters
Postage stamp maps
Guidelines for synoptic use of the EPS.
 
 

The ensemble information at an individual grid-point location may be displayed through a probabilistic meteogram, which indicates the time evolution of a given parameter for all ensemble members. The spread is indicated by the range of forecast values. 50% of the members are distributed evenly around the median to define a vertical rectangle. The remaining members define the extreme 25% "spikes". The epsgram thus provides a discrete probability information in the intervals 0-25%, 25-50%, 50-75% and 75-100% which is sufficient for many applications.

The deterministic TL511 and TL255 forecasts may be included as a reference, as could the ensemble mean. To help the assessment of useful predictability the typical climatological variance might also be included. It is often useful to know when the spread might cover most of the climatological range.

As stressed in chapter 6.7 users should be careful when interpreting direct model output. Only the temperature forecasts in the epsgrams can be corrected for differences between true height above the sea level and the model height (according to the Standard atmosphere). Locations along seas borders often suffer from large systematic errors, in particular with respect to temperature. The reason is that the strong temperature differences between land and sea may be poorly resolved by the TL255 resolution.

guide2007-57.gif
  1. The forecast uncertainty, as indicated by the EPS spread, is changing with the parameter, it is usually larger for cloud cover, and it usually increases with the forecast step. However uncertainty is also flow or feature dependent and there might be cases, as this EPSgrams example shows, where forecast uncertainty is larger at shorter forecast steps. In this case uncertainty in the positioning of a surface low has resulted in a large spread in wind and precipitation.



Top of page 31-03-2007
 
   Compare Pages Page Details         © ECMWF
 Conflicting spread indications  Spaghetti diagrams  
shim shim shim