July 1993 showed anomalously high precipitation
over the Central USA, with exceptional flooding of the Mississippi (Changnon 1996). During this month, the
new version of the ECMWF model (CY48) and the then operational version (CY47)1,
were running in parallel at full resolution (spectral truncation T213, grid-point
spacing ~ 60 km), including data assimilation. Beljaarset al. (1996) compared
the performance of the two schemes, looking at the average of all one-,
two- and three-day forecasts verifying between 9 and 25 July. While the
day one precipitation of the two systems were very similar, and similar
to the observed precipitation, the forecasts at day 3 were markedly different.
In the new system, the location and intensity of the maximum precipitation
was similar to the observations (40 N, 95 W), while the old system had less
then half the precipitation amount in the area of the observed maximum and
had a spurious maximum of precipitation displaced 800 km NE. In the old
system, there was a gradual reduction in precipitation from day 1 to day
3, while the new system was able to better maintain the intensity. However,
evaporation at the area of maximum precipitation was similar for the old
and new system, and in both systems there was no evidence of forecast spin
down, strongly suggesting that the local evaporation was not responsible
for the differences in precipitation. It turns out that the maximum of the
evaporation difference was located over the Mexican Plateau, 1000 km SW
of the precipitation maximum, two to three days upstream as suggested by
backwards trajectories ending up at 750 hPa, 40 N, 95 W. The mean thermodynamic
profiles, similar for day 1 forecasts, were very different for day 3 forecasts.
The old model showed a too strong capping inversion above the BL, with air
too warm and too dry and much lower values of CAPE. It is clear that the
differential advection mechanism characteristic of the US Monsoon was responsible
for the differences in precipitation. When compared to the new model, the
soil on the Mexican Plateau had much lower values of soil moisture in CY47,
giving a much reduced evaporation, which in turn produced a warm and dry
air mass that capped the BL downstream, inhibiting convection. In CY47,
the soil model values were strongly forced to an erroneous, too dry, climatology:
In such a data dense area, atmospheric profiles were initiated to correct
values, but during the forecast they slowly felt the influence of the erroneous
soil moisture values. In CY48 the soil moisture values were initialised
to field capacity at the beginning of July, consistent with values of June
precipitation in the area much above normal. There was no forcing to climatology
in CY48 (Viterbo and Beljaars 1995) and the model
was capable of maintaining high values of moisture throughout July. Monthly
integrations performed with CY47 and CY48 suggested the importance of the
memory associated to idealised soil moisture anomalies in the initial conditions
(Beljaarset al. 1996). The monthly
precipitation fields with CY48 compared much better to observations than
those of CY47.
The forecast results above corroborate the
study of Thomas and Rowntree (1992) on the role
of the boreal forests in conditioning the climate at high latitudes. The
spring months of two five-year experiments, the first with a (realistic)
snow albedo and the second with the high latitude forests removed are compared.
The latter experiment is colder than the former in the continental areas
north of 50 N. Pielke and Vidale (1995) suggested
that the boundary between tundra and boreal forests is a region of enhanced
horizontal temperature gradients, acting as a pre-conditioner for baroclinic
instability and "locking" the climatological position of the polar front.
In analysing further refinements to the ECMWF snow model,van den Hurket al. (2000) show
that (a) simulating the boreal forest control on evaporation in spring (reduced
transpiration from frozen soils) and (b) increasing the runoff over frozen
soils, improves the agreement of model results with observations.